tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12505562.post112976783461475868..comments2024-03-15T11:42:21.265-04:00Comments on The Patry Copyright Blog: Appropriation Art and CopiesWilliam Patryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12987498082479617363noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12505562.post-1129842286262712212005-10-20T17:04:00.000-04:002005-10-20T17:04:00.000-04:00Speaking of the Amish, "The Devils Playground" is ...Speaking of the Amish, "The Devils Playground" is a very interesting video documentary about the period of time that Amish teenagers can take to go out and be like the "English" before deciding whether to be baptized in the church.William Patryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12987498082479617363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12505562.post-1129836164006126352005-10-20T15:22:00.000-04:002005-10-20T15:22:00.000-04:00/* artists have been the most fervent advocates of.../* artists have been the most fervent advocates of moral rights, which are based on the Romantic inseparability of the artist and his or her work. <BR/>*/<BR/><BR/>Yes, it's interesting how *everybody* takes the "what I do is morally acceptable, but I'm not sure about what you do" approach. The line "the art community is itself divided on appropriation art, with some artists whose works have been appropriated viewing the appropriators as destroying art" reminded me of "Gangster Paradise" vs. "Amish Paradise."Max Lybberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13935322217857952629noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12505562.post-1129823105217309942005-10-20T11:45:00.000-04:002005-10-20T11:45:00.000-04:00Tom:Section 19 of the 1909 Act required that the n...Tom:<BR/><BR/>Section 19 of the 1909 Act required that the notice appear "on some accessible portion of ... copies or on the margin, back, permanent base, or pedestal, or of the substance on which ... copies shall be mounted," so there was flexibility in where to place the notice in a way that didn't disfigure the image. See Coventry Ware, Inc. v. Reliance Picture Frame Co., 288 F.2d 193 (2d Cir. 1961)(notice on back of wall plaque OK).William Patryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12987498082479617363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12505562.post-1129819672153291172005-10-20T10:47:00.000-04:002005-10-20T10:47:00.000-04:00Could there be any more of a Dada spectacle than a...Could there be any more of a Dada spectacle than a collusive infringement suit over a Readymade? It would have been great. I believe Picabia did another version of L.H.O.O.Q., so the stage was even set. And, a horrible waste of the judicial process, but still great. <BR/><BR/>Question: How did fine art get around the notice requirement of the pre-1976 copyright act?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com