Friday, August 01, 2008

End of the Blog

I have decided to end the blog, after doing around 800 postings over about 4 years. I regret closing the blog and I owe readers an explanation. There are two reasons.

1. The Inability or Refusal to Accept the Blog for What it is: A Personal Blog

I have been a full-time copyright lawyer for 26 years. My late mother, aleha ha-shalom, told me repeatedly that I had a religious obligation to learn every day, and I have honored her memory by doing exactly that. Learning also involves changing how you think about things; it doesn't only mean reinforcing the existing views you already have. In this respect, Second Circuit Judge Pierre Leval once said that the best way to know you have a mind is to change it, and I have tried to live by that wisdom too. There are positions I have taken in the past I no longer hold, and some that I continue to hold. I have tried to be honest with myself: if you are not genuinely honest with yourself, you can't learn, and if you worry about what others think of you, you will be living their version of your life and not yours.

I started the blog when I was still in private practice with the above goals in mind and one more: I felt there was no blog devoted to the geekery of copyright; meaning a blog where people who loved copyright could come and discuss copyright issues in a non-partisan way. In order to encourage open discussion I permitted not only comments but anonymous and pseudonymous comments. I did that because I wanted to encourage the largest number of people to participate, and after four years I believe that was the right decision. But it is also the right decision to end the blog. While in private practice I never had the experience of people attributing my views to my firm or to my clients. I moved from private practice to Google I put a disclaimer to the effect that the views in the blog (as in the past) were strictly mine. I also set a policy, which I strictly adhered to, of never discussing cases Google was involved in, and I refrained from criticizing those with whom Google was involved in lawsuits. I did not run ads, including not using Google's AdSense program. I cannot see what more I could have done to make what was a personal blog more separate from my employer.

For the first year after joining Google, with some exceptions, people honored the personal nature of the blog, but no longer. When other blogs or news stories refer to the blog, the inevitable opening sentence now is: "William Patry, Google's Senior Copyright Counsel said," or "Google's top copyright lawyer said... ." There is nothing I can do to stop this false implication that I am speaking on Google's behalf. And that's just those who do so because they are lazy. Others, for partisan purposes, insist on on misdescribing the blog as a Google blog, or in one case involving a think tank, darkly indicating also a la Senator Joe McCarthy, that in addition to funding from Google, there may be other sources of funding too. On Blogger, blogs are free. The blog had no funding because it doesn't cost anything, because I don't run ads, and because it was my personal blog, started before I joined Google.

On top of this there are the crazies, whom it is impossible to reason with, who do not have a life of their own and so insist on ruining the lives of others, and preferably as many as possible. I asked myself last week after having to deal with the craziest of the crazies yet, "why subject yourself to this?" I could come up with no reason why I should: My grandfather chose to be a psychiatrist, but I chose a different professional path, one that doesn't obligate me to put up with such nonsense.

In the end, I concluded that it is no longer possible for me to have a blog that will be respected for what it is, a personal blog. I don't draw any grand conclusions from this and hope others don't either. The decision was 100% mine. No one at Google ever asked, suggested, or hinted that I should end the blog. To the contrary, in keeping with Google's deep commitment to free speech, the company encourages blogs like mine, and has stood completely behind me.

2. The Current State of Copyright Law is too depressing

This leads me to my final reason for closing the blog which is independent of the first reason: my fear that the blog was becoming too negative in tone. I regard myself as a centrist. I believe very much that in proper doses copyright is essential for certain classes of works, especially commercial movies, commercial sound recordings, and commercial books, the core copyright industries. I accept that the level of proper doses will vary from person to person and that my recommended dose may be lower (or higher) than others. But in my view, and that of my cherished brother Sir Hugh Laddie, we are well past the healthy dose stage and into the serious illness stage. Much like the U.S. economy, things are getting worse, not better. Copyright law has abandoned its reason for being: to encourage learning and the creation of new works. Instead, its principal functions now are to preserve existing failed business models, to suppress new business models and technologies, and to obtain, if possible, enormous windfall profits from activity that not only causes no harm, but which is beneficial to copyright owners. Like Humpty-Dumpty, the copyright law we used to know can never be put back together again: multilateral and trade agreements have ensured that, and quite deliberately.

It is profoundly depressing, after 26 years full-time in a field I love, to be a constant voice of dissent. I have tried various ways to leaven this state of affairs with positive postings, much like television news shows that experiment with "happy features." I have blogged about great articles others have written, or highlighted scholars who have not gotten the attention they deserve; I tried to find cases, even inconsequential ones, that I can fawn over. But after awhile, this wore thin, because the most important stories are too often ones that involve initiatives that are, in my opinion, seriously harmful to the public interest. I cannot continue to be so negative, so often. Being so negative, while deserved on the merits, gives a distorted perspective of my centrist views, and is emotionally a downer.

So between the inability or refusal of some people to accept the blog for what it is -- a personal blog --- and my inability to continue to be Cassandra, I decided it was time to pull the plug. I thank profusely all those who have accepted the blog for what it is, and who have contributed so much to it and to my learning over the years. I intend to spend my free time figuring out a constructive way to talk about the difficult issues we face and how to advance toward their solution.


«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210
timothy moriarty said...

Sub: Election tools for your state
Your state is going to play a key role in the upcoming Presidential Election and our tools will help you in making registration to vote easy and obtaining an absentee ballot.
Please check for more information

Hugh Chatfield said...

DNA records prove that Sarah Palin is actually the long lost sister of
Michael Palin of Monty Python! While clearcuttiing the old growth Tongass Forest she sings

"I'm a lumberjack-governor and I'm okay,
I sleep all night and I work all day.
I cut down trees,
we build that bridge that goes where I belong.
Obama is muslim, I hope you like my song."

CASE - now with holiness said...

It is very sad to see you will no longer be blogging, your blog has been an invaluable resource on United States copyright law and the wider aspects of copyright. As a young intellectual property lawyer in Australia, this blog has been a vital viewing portal into the legal challenges and changes in the United States.

Thank you for your efforts.

BandarBush said...

I wish you would quit Google rather than quit on us but I can certainly understand your decision. I've greatly appreciated your writings; throughout law school, you've gotten me through many otherwise dull commutes as I read your thoughts on my way to school or work. There will be an enormous void in the online academy without your strong voice. Godspeed.

Saskia said...

It is sad to see this blog gone! Especially as it looks like the copyright debate has only just begun…

In the UK the implementation of the Gowers Review by the UK Intellectual Property Office could lead to a prominent public debate on how copyright can balance the interests of authors with the need for a public domain, and at the same encourage innovation (as intended by the Statute of Anne). At the same time the European Commission is looking into reforming copyright, and then there is ACTA (Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement).

Its important that the debate continues, and this blog has certainly done much to advance the debate in recent years.

I wish you all the best.

Anonymous said...

I have enjoyed this Blog immensely.
Fare thee well.

~Emmett McAuliffe
General Counsel
Digital Copyright Exchange

lucas law center said...

Sad to hear about this blog that it would be ho away. I love this stuff. Thanks for your post. I hope people realize how valuable this kind of information is.


Ecommerce web design said...

Thank you for all your past efforts on this blog. I am enormously sad to hear this. Enjoyed your blog and more importantly. I have been a fan for about a year.

Seattle DUI Attorney said...

Sorry to see you go, but have a blast at Google!

Anonymous said...

To bad!

am very sorry to hear that you won't be blogging any longer. I look to your blog for important and timely information about the copyright caselaw. But even more important to me, I value your insight, your perspective, and your bold

Admin said...

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 210 of 210   Newer› Newest»